Florida launched the first state-level lawsuit against OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman on Monday. The legal action accuses the artificial intelligence company of ignoring safety warnings. Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier claims OpenAI prioritized winning “the AI arms race and amass large fortunes” over user protection. The 83-page lawsuit marks a significant escalation in state-level regulation of AI companies. The complaint alleges OpenAI released ChatGPT while knowing it posed dangers to users. Florida accuses the company of violating product liability laws. The lawsuit also raises negligence claims and deceptive trade practices violations. Uthmeier seeks civil penalties and court orders blocking data collection from users under 13 without parental consent. Attorney General Announces Historic Legal Action “Today, we announced the first-in-the-nation state-led lawsuit against OpenAI and its CEO, Sam Altman,” said Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier. “OpenAI and Altman ignored internal and external safety warnings, put children at great risk, and allowed a dangerous product to reach millions of Floridians.” Uthmeier held a press conference Monday to announce the filing. He emphasized the state’s commitment to protecting children from AI-related harms. The Attorney General believes Altman and the company could face billions of dollars in penalties. Florida seeks to hold the CEO personally liable for the alleged violations. Sweeping Allegations of User Harm The lawsuit presents a comprehensive list of alleged harms to both minors and adults. These impacts span multiple categories of user safety. Florida highlights public safety concerns including violent crimes aided by the chatbot. The complaint also cites professional reputational damage and cognitive decline among regular users. “Because of Defendants’ misrepresentations about ChatGPT and their careless introduction of ChatGPT to Florida and the world, mass shooters have been aided and abetted in deadly rampages, vulnerable people have been encouraged into suicide, professionals have suffered public humiliation, users have lost critical thinking skills, and minors have become addicted to a tool that feigns human compassion to collect their data with no parental oversight,” the 83-page lawsuit claims. The complaint accuses ChatGPT of encouraging vulnerable people to commit suicide. It alleges the chatbot addicts children to a tool that mimics human compassion. Florida claims OpenAI collects children’s data without adequate parental oversight. The lawsuit emphasizes the company marketed ChatGPT as safe and reliable, including for children. Florida State University Shooting Investigation The Florida attorney general’s office launched a criminal investigation into the company in April. That probe sought to determine ChatGPT’s role in a mass shooting at Florida State University. The shooting took place last year on the university campus. Prior to the attack, the shooter allegedly consulted the chatbot for planning assistance. A civil lawsuit already targets OpenAI from the family of one shooting victim. The family seeks damages for the role ChatGPT allegedly played in the tragedy. OpenAI previously denied responsibility for the Florida shooting incident. The company maintains its technology bears no culpability for user actions. “Last year’s mass shooting at Florida State University was a tragedy, but ChatGPT is not responsible for this terrible crime,” an OpenAI spokesperson previously told NBC News. OpenAI Defends Safety Measures OpenAI spokesperson Kayla Wood responded to the lawsuit with an emailed statement. The company acknowledges the devastating nature of losing a child to tragedy. Wood emphasized OpenAI has enacted safeguards specifically designed for young users. The company points to its “more protective experience” for minors as evidence of responsible development. “AI is a new and powerful technology, and we believe minors need significant protection, which is why we have put in place industry leading protections and policies,” OpenAI said. “We know pointing to this work will not bring a child back, but we’re committed to getting this right.” The company highlights several protective features it built directly into its products. OpenAI developed an age prediction tool to identify potentially underage users. The system defaults users whose age remains uncertain into more protective experiences. OpenAI also provides parents with monitoring tools to track their children’s AI usage. Broader Pattern of AI Accountability Lawsuits The lawsuit follows a growing national trend of legal action against AI companies. Other chatbot makers already face similar litigation from state governments. In January, Kentucky sued Character Technologies Inc. over its Character.AI app. That lawsuit alleged the company targeted children and contributed to self-harm incidents. Florida argues OpenAI’s existing safeguards, including parental controls, remain inadequate. The state claims the company failed to warn users about ChatGPT’s potential dangers. Instead, OpenAI marketed the product as safe and reliable across all age groups. This marketing strategy allegedly misled consumers about the true risks of chatbot interaction. “This litany of harms is driven by Defendants’ insatiable quest to win the AI arms race and amass large fortunes, despite knowing the danger of ChatGPT,” the complaint said. “The rise of OpenAI is attributable to a web of deceit and the exploitation of users (including Floridians), leveraging their data and safety to boost OpenAI’s market value at unacceptable costs.” Personal Liability for CEO Sam Altman Florida takes the unusual step of seeking personal liability against Sam Altman. The state argues the CEO bears direct responsibility for safety failures. This approach differs from typical corporate litigation that targets only the company entity. Uthmeier emphasized this point during his Monday press conference. “Sam Altman and ChatGPT have chosen the AI race over the safety and security of our kids,” Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier said at a press conference on Monday. The lawsuit represents a first-of-its-kind state litigation effort against a major AI company. Its outcome could establish precedent for future state-level AI regulation. Legal experts will closely watch how courts balance innovation against consumer protection. The case may define the boundaries of corporate responsibility in the rapidly evolving AI industry. OpenAI recently concluded a separate legal battle with former co-founder Elon Musk. Musk sued the company in 2024, accusing it of betraying its original humanitarian mission. He claimed OpenAI abandoned its principles by converting into a for-profit business. That case concluded when the jury decided against Musk‘s claims. Post navigation Jensen Huang Used One Word to Describe AI Demand That Could Define 2026 Palo Alto Networks Crushes Earnings as AI Cybersecurity Bet Pays Off